The Nature and Aesthetics of Design

David Pye’s article discussed the limitations in creating designs, as well as the purpose for design. First, production is hindered by two factors: economy and materials. We make objects to fit budgets or to cater to a certain income level.Materials also dictate construction & aesthetics. A metal may be strong and supportive but lack warmth and personality. Wood, although warm and inviting, may not be the strongest building option. In this way, a designer must make decisions about what qualities are most important for his creation. 

Design is meant to promote happiness. It creates comfortable, livable surroundings. It not only gives a man what he needs to survive, but conveys beauty. “The only way design can add happiness is by beautifying the environment and constantly enriching its visual quality,” the article said. 

I definitely agree that design is hindered by money and materials. I sometimes cheap out and sacrifice my design for my wallet. In addition, I thought it was interesting the author pointed out how flat surfaces are not found in nature. 

What struck me the most about this article though was its justification of the artist’s job. I have often wondered if I should be concerned with a more self-sacrificing, practical profession. In a chaotic world of suffering, it seems unnecessary to be fixated on beautifying our surroundings. However, Pye states that art has great importance. It makes life worth living. It provides hope to the masses. The artist’s talent for creating beauty should therefor be shared confidently with others. This section was very comforting to me, and made me feel like my work is worthwhile.